Polls

How Is My Site?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Recent Comments

  • Justin: No more years? Obama has a tough road ahead of him, and McCain is lying faster than the media and Obama...
  • Teagan: Sorry, I just had to tell you that comment you left over at Pandagon re: McCain being the Lich King was so...
  • Michael: Damn, that sucks.
  • sonicgirl_79: Thank you! We need more proof that abstinance only education produces teenage pregnancies. I...
  • Michael: Wow, those are some lazy-ass “journalists”.

Categories

Calendar

March 2006
M T W T F S S
« Feb   Apr »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Statistics

  • Total Stats
    • 458 Comments

UserOnline

Soon to be illegal in a state near you!

March 30th, 2006 by Steve

This is actually a scary story, fortunately with a happy ending.

2-month old had fetuses inside her.

The AP reports that yesterday a young girl in Pakistan had not one, but two, fetuses surgically removed from her body. The surgery was performed at the Pakistan Institute of Medical Science in Islamabad on a patient known only as “Nazia.”

Authorities in the US are uncertain how such a case would be handled under new forced-childbirth legislation currently being proposed in many states. That the fetuses were actually “Nazia”’s siblings most likely would be of little consequence, given that there will be no legal exception for incest in such states as South Dakota or Tennessee… [snip]

Fortunately, the fetus-carrier, who is two months old, resides in Pakistan, rather than the US of the future, and was thus able to have doctors deal with the situation, which is known as fetus-in-fetu— a medical abnormality that occurs about once every 500,000 births, wherein a fetus in the womb has another fetus (or in this case, two) growing inside it. As the hospital’s head of pediatric surgery explained: “Basically, it’s a case of triplets, but two of the siblings grew in the other.”

Of course, this doesn’t meet the requirements of South Dakota’s Bill Napoli, who said she had to be raped ‘brutally’, have been a virgin, and followed Christianity. Clearly, this young baby was none of the above! Welcome to the consequences of the ‘pro-life’ movement.

Posted in General, Political | 2 Comments »