Did I mention that he’s a hypocrite?
December 16th, 2005 by SteveOne last post before I head home for my month-long break. WOOT!
Some background on this story. For the past 2 years, during every White House gaggle, the official Administration talking point has been that the President would not comment on the CIA leak case because “it was an on-going investigation”. This week, however, President Hypocrite opened his mouth and commented on the on-going investigation into Tom “The Hammer” Delay. As you can imagine, the WH press pool was a bit… upset.
Q But it’s hypocritical. You have a policy for some investigations and not others, when it’s a political ally who you need to get work done?
MR. McCLELLAN: Call it presidential prerogative; he responded to that question. But the White House established a policy –
Q Doesn’t it raise questions about his credibility that he’s going to weigh in on some matters and not others, and we’re just supposed to sit back and wait for him to decide what he wants to comment on and influence?
MR. McCLELLAN: Congressman DeLay’s matter is an ongoing legal proceeding –
Q As is the Fitzgerald investigation –
MR. McCLELLAN: The Fitzgerald investigation is –
Q — As you’ve told us ad nauseam from the podium.
MR. McCLELLAN: It’s an ongoing investigation, as well.
Q How can you not — how can you say there’s differences between the two, and we’re supposed to buy that? There’s no differences. The President decided to weigh in on one, and not the other.
MR. McCLELLAN: There are differences.
Poor Scotty. The press got tired of sucking your collective dicks. They’ll be challenging you for the next 3 years.
Have fun with that.
Posted in General, Political | No Comments »