Polls

How Is My Site?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Recent Comments

  • Michael: Damn, that sucks.
  • sonicgirl_79: Thank you! We need more proof that abstinance only education produces teenage pregnancies. I...
  • Michael: Wow, those are some lazy-ass “journalists”.
  • Summer: Those parents deserve to suffer dreadfully. If there is any justice in the universe, they will someday come...
  • Steve: Wow! So apparently the new goalpost for anything to get done is for “all” Americans to want...

Categories

Calendar

November 2004
M T W T F S S
« Oct   Dec »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930  

Statistics

  • Total Stats
    • 455 Comments

UserOnline

Conservative Opposition to Interracial Gay Marriage

November 5th, 2004 by Steve

For those who deny the similarities:

“Almighty God created the races white, black, yellow, malay and red and he placed them on separate continents,” wrote a Virginia appeals court judge as late as 1965. “The fact that he separated the races shows that he did not intend for the races to mix.” Not only was intermarriage considered anti-Christian, it was deemed morally repugnant. “Intermarriage between whites and blacks is repulsive and averse to every sentiment of pure American spirit,” said Georgia’s Sen. Seaborn Roddenberry in 1912. “Let us uproot and exterminate now this debasing, ultra-demoralizing, un-American and inhuman leprosy.”

Replace “races” with “sexes” and change the colors to “man and woman” and “intermarriage between the races” with “marriage between people of the same gender”, and it’s identical arguments. The Supreme Court ruling which made interracial marriage legal should be applicable, but shockingly the conservative courts and legislatures refuse to apply it.

Posted in General | 1 Comment »